Woman dies after ‘mechanical bed had her trapped against wall for two days’

An elderly grandmother, Rosalind Walker, tragically passed away after being trapped between her adjustable bed and a wall for two days. The shocking incident, which occurred in March 2023, has led to a lawsuit against the bed manufacturer Sleep Number and its supplier, Leggett & Platt. This heartbreaking case raises critical questions about product safety, accountability, and the design of consumer products meant for vulnerable individuals.

Rosalind Walker is said to have been trapped by her bed (Elias, Kallal and Schaff Funeral Home)
Rosalind Walker is said to have been trapped by her bed (Elias, Kallal and Schaff Funeral Home)

The Incident: A Horrifying Discovery

Rosalind Walker, 80, from Godfrey, Illinois, was found trapped between her Sleep Number bed and the wall of her bedroom on March 3, 2023. According to court documents, the bed had allegedly “lowered itself without warning,” pinning Walker in place for two days. Emergency responders were able to free her, but the ordeal left her severely injured.

She was rushed to the hospital for treatment and later transferred to a rehabilitation facility before returning home under hospice care. Sadly, Walker succumbed to her injuries on April 3, 2023, just a month after the tragic incident.

The Lawsuit: Seeking Justice for Rosalind Walker

Walker’s daughter, Angela Moan, has filed a lawsuit against Sleep Number and Leggett & Platt, alleging negligence in the design, manufacturing, and marketing of the adjustable bed. The lawsuit claims the bed was “defective and unreasonably dangerous,” citing the following points:

  • Lack of Safety Warnings: The bed allegedly lacked adequate instructions or cautionary language to warn users of potential risks, such as the danger of being trapped between the bed and the wall.
  • No Audible Alerts: The lawsuit states that the bed did not include an audible warning system to alert Walker as it lowered unexpectedly.
  • Absence of Emergency Release Mechanism: The bed reportedly lacked a proper release mechanism that could have enabled Walker to free herself.

The lawsuit seeks more than $25,000 in compensation for Walker’s suffering, medical expenses, and the devastating loss her family endured.

Statements from the Parties Involved

Both Sleep Number and Leggett & Platt have expressed condolences to Walker’s family while maintaining their commitment to product safety.

Sleep Number is being sued for its part in the tragedy (Getty Images for Sleep Number)
Sleep Number is being sued for its part in the tragedy (Getty Images for Sleep Number)
  • Sleep Number: The company stated that it was only informed of the incident after the lawsuit was filed in December 2023. A spokesperson affirmed Sleep Number’s confidence in the safety of its products, noting that its legal team is reviewing the allegations.
  • Leggett & Platt: Jennifer Davis, the company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel, also expressed condolences and pledged to fully cooperate with the investigation.

Product Design and Vulnerable Consumers: What Went Wrong?

Adjustable beds are often marketed as convenient and supportive for individuals with limited mobility, making safety a top priority. However, this case highlights potential oversights in design and safety features that can have devastating consequences.

1. Insufficient Warning Systems

The lawsuit claims the bed lacked audible alerts to warn Walker that it was lowering. For elderly or less mobile individuals, such a feature could make the difference between life and death.

2. Lack of Emergency Release Mechanisms

The absence of a release mechanism further compounded the tragedy. Adjustable beds designed for at-risk users should include safety failsafes to prevent entrapment in the event of a malfunction.

3. Misalignment Between Marketing and Reality

While these beds are advertised as being helpful for people with limited mobility, the incident underscores the need for rigorous safety testing and user education to ensure they meet the needs of their intended audience.

A Family’s Heartbreaking Loss

Angela Moan described her mother’s final days as deeply distressing, stating that Walker “suffered the entire time” after being trapped by the bed. The lawsuit emphasizes that such incidents are preventable and calls for accountability from companies that design and manufacture these products.

The emotional toll on Walker’s family has been immense. For two days, Walker was left immobilized, and the long-term effects of the ordeal ultimately contributed to her death.

Consumer Product Safety: What Needs to Change?

This tragedy raises pressing concerns about consumer product safety standards and how they are enforced.

1. Stricter Regulations for Adjustable Beds

Manufacturers of adjustable beds should be required to implement safety features such as:

  • Audible alerts to notify users of bed movement.
  • Emergency release systems to allow quick disengagement during malfunctions.
  • Clear and prominent warnings about placement near walls or other obstacles.

2. Routine Safety Inspections

Adjustable beds and other mobility aids should undergo regular safety inspections to ensure they meet evolving standards.

3. Enhanced Education for Consumers

Users, particularly elderly individuals and their caregivers, should be provided with comprehensive instructions and safety guidelines. This includes educating consumers on the risks of improper bed placement and how to respond to malfunctions.

Corporate Responsibility and Legal Implications

The lawsuit against Sleep Number and Leggett & Platt serves as a stark reminder that companies bear a responsibility to prioritize user safety. Negligence in product design, inadequate warnings, or failure to address known risks can have catastrophic consequences.

If the court rules in favor of Walker’s family, the case could set a precedent for stricter accountability in the design and marketing of consumer products for vulnerable populations.

Moving Forward: Lessons from a Tragedy

The death of Rosalind Walker is a heartbreaking example of how even common household items can pose unexpected dangers. As this case unfolds, it serves as a call to action for manufacturers, regulators, and consumers alike to prioritize safety and vigilance.

For families relying on products designed for mobility and comfort, this tragedy underscores the importance of conducting thorough research, asking questions about safety features, and ensuring that items are used in ways that minimize risk.

Ultimately, the hope is that this incident will lead to meaningful change in the industry, preventing similar tragedies and honoring the memory of Rosalind Walker.

Related Posts